Ture Nermans bok ”Folkhatet” och massakern i Srebrenica 1995.

Skriver idag i Frihetssmedjan detta: Idag är det 17 år sen massakern i Srebrenica, Bosnien, när 8000 bosniska muslimer slaktades i den värsta enskilda massakern i Europa sen andra världskriget. Alex Bengtsson från Expo har skrivit bra om folkmordet i Srebrenica och i DN finns en artikel om folkmordsförnekarna idag. Men vilka var drivkrafterna bakom folkmordet? 

Folkhatets offer i Srebrenica för 17 år sen.

Vi som följde den politiska debatten då minns hur situationen på Balkan präglades av hat: kroater som hatade muslimer och serber, serber som hatade muslimer och kroater, bosniska muslimer som hatade kroater och serber, och i Sverige sverigedemokrater och andra rasister som hatade alla folken där nere och pratade om att ”asfaltera Balkan”.

Hat är en mäktig drivkraft för människor. Folkhat: hatet mot kulturer, religioner och grupper av människor, är kanske den mest destruktiva form av hat som finns.

Tyvärr funkar vi människor så att det oftast är lättare för oss att reagera mot orättvisor som begås mot den egna gruppen, men att lägga märke till det då samma orättvisor begår mot folk som inte står lika nära, är ofta inte lika lätt, och ännu färre reagerar mot det. Att se, och reagera mot, orättvisor som begås mot grupper man själv inte gillar, eller som är ens politiska motståndare, är givetvis ännu svårare.

Ture Nerman, som under andra världskriget drev den antinazistiska och antisovjetiska tidningen ”Trots Allt”, reagerade tidigt mot det politiska hatet. 1918, på den tiden han var socialist och ung, gav han ut en bok om ”Folkhatet” som är nästan helt bortglömd idag. Men det är en viktig bok, med slutsatser om det förrödande folkhatet som formade mycket av hans liv och hans kommande avståndstagande till kommunismen, samt hans motstånd mot nazismen.

Boken handlar om den politiska krigspropagandan under det första världskriget. Den visar hur tyskarna spred hat om de allierade som kollektiv och de allierade hat mot tyskarna som kollektiv. Den visar dessutom hur detta hat har sin grund i demonisering av fienden och i negativa generaliseringar om fienden.

I propagandan spreds kollektiva demoniseringar om den ”onda tysken” om ”pedofila ryssar”, om att alla ”fransmän vill våldta”… Dessa stereotyper eggade upp hatet mot fienden i befolkningen.

Folkhatet går igen

I Trots Allt skrev Ture Nerman 1942, mitt under det andra världskrigetm att det är sorgligt att ”ett folk som var utsatt för så mycket rasistiskt hat, som tyskarna, själva valde att ta upp hatets metaforer” och vända hatet mot judarna.

Ja, det är alltid synd. Jag vet… Jag vet inte hur många gånger jag stött på folk ur grupper som ofta utsatts för hat, och med sorg tvingas se att de själva bär hat mot någon annan grupp människor.

Som ett spöke vandrar folkhatet genom historien. Folkhatet sprids från land till land och kontinent till kontinent och från tid till tid. Och hatets metaforer är alltid detsamma.

Unken hatretorik som redan var gammal och unken då babylonierna eller egyptierna bankade in hat i varandras skallar för 5000 år sen, återanvänds än idag. Man pekar ut grupper. Man sprider folkhat.

Babyloniernas kultur är brottslig, babylonierna är barbarer som anser att våldtäkt är rätt, dessutom uppfostras de till att bli ansvarslösa och aggressiva, sa Medern…

Assyriens kultur är brottslig, assyrierna är barbarer som anser att våldtäkt är rätt, dessutom uppfostras de till att bli ansvarslösa och aggressiva, sa Babyloniern…

Phoenicier är giriga, sa Egyptiern…

Judarnas kultur är brottslig, judar är barbarer som anser att våldtäkt är rätt, dessutom uppfostras de till att bli ansvarslösa och aggressiva, sa Phoeniciern…

Grekernas kultur är brottslig, greker är barbarer som anser att våldtäkt är rätt, dessutom uppfostras de till att bli ansvarslösa och aggressiva, sa perserna och judarna…

Alla andras kulturer är brottslig, alla andra är barbarer som anser att våldtäkt är rätt, dessutom uppfostras de till att bli ansvarslösa och aggressiva, sa romaren…

Romarens kultur är brottslig, romare är barbarer som anser att våldtäkt är rätt, dessutom uppfostras de till att bli ansvarslösa och aggressiva, sa den kristne…

De kristnas kultur är brottslig, de kristna är barbarer som anser att våldtäkt är rätt, dessutom uppfostras de till att bli ansvarslösa och aggressiva, sa muslimen…

Judarna är giriga, sa den kristne…

Danskarnas kultur är brottslig, danskar är barbarer som anser att våldtäkt är rätt, dessutom uppfostras de till att bli ansvarslösa och aggressiva, sa svensken…

Svenskarnas kultur är brottslig, svenskar är barbarer som anser att våldtäkt är rätt, dessutom uppfostras de till att bli ansvarslösa och aggressiva, sa dansken…

Skandinavernas kultur är brottslig, svenskar och danskar är barbarer som anser att våldtäkt är rätt, dessutom uppfostras de till att bli ansvarslösa och aggressiva, sa tysken under 30-åriga kriget…

Judarnas kultur är brottslig, judar är barbarer som anser att våldtäkt är rätt, dessutom uppfostras de till att bli ansvarslösa och aggressiva, sa nazisten på 30-talet…

Muslimernas kultur är brottslig, muslimerna är barbarer som anser att våldtäkt är rätt, dessutom uppfostras de till att bli ansvarslösa och aggressiva, som alltför många säger än idag…

Etc, etc…

Vem anses brottslig imorgon? Du?

Man kan tänka sig hur man redan under stenåldern pekade ut folket i den andra grottan och sa: ”deras kultur är brottslig, deär barbarer som anser att våldtäkt är rätt, dessutom uppfostras de till att bli ansvarslösa och aggressiva”…

Folkhat föder folkhat som föder folkhat. Och alltid dessa förbannade negativa generaliseringar om andra grupper.

Jag har lagt ut Ture Nermans bok Folkhatet på Scribd: Ni kan läsa eller ladda hem den här! Det är en viktig bok, av en fin och modig människa: Ture Nerman.

Till sist. Nermans dikt om kärleken. Vilka visor om kärleken kom aldrig på pränt efter folkmordet i Bosnien, och efter åren av krig, uppeggat av det ömsesidiga folkhatet där?

Den vackraste visan om kärleken

Text: Ture Nerman, 1916
Musik: Lille Bror Söderlundh, 1939

Den vackraste visan om kärleken
kom aldrig på pränt.
Den blev kvar i en dröm på Montmartre
hos en fattig parisstudent.

Den skulle ha lyst över länderna
och bringat en vår på knä,
och en värld skulle tryckt till sitt hjärta
en ny, en ny Musset.

Han skulle ha vandrat längs kajerna
med en blåögd liten Lucile
och diktat violer och kyssar
nu en natt i april.

Men den vackraste visan om kärleken
kom aldrig på pränt.
Den begrovs i en massgrav i Flandern
med en fattig parisstudent.

Annonser

24 thoughts on “Ture Nermans bok ”Folkhatet” och massakern i Srebrenica 1995.

  1. Ping: Ture Nerman: Folkhatet (1918) « Liberala och anti-totalitära källor

  2. Sjung å va glad!
    mel.Sarek – Vinterland

    Här I natten går vi hastigt fram
    Själv Hitler leder oss
    Och hans öga lyser blekt och runt
    I ärans stjärnebloss
    Du tar en kniv och håller den
    Det värmer inuti
    Och förväntan föds om framtiden
    Om hur vårt krig skall bli

    Alla ryssar hänger på stolparna
    Män och kvinnor, gubbar och barn
    Stolta svenskar skär ben av kropparna
    Och maler dem i en kvarn
    Som kristallen glittrar ett stort hakkors
    Under himlens stjärnebrand
    Führer är I dig, Führer är I mig
    Leve Hitlers rasseland!

    I skolan läste vi Mein Kampf
    Tvivel har vi inte ens
    Att världen hör till herreras
    Bevara Sverige Svenskt!
    Rasrensning bör utgöra vi
    Med hjärtat kallt som is
    Och när det blir inga ryssar kvar
    Då blir det paradis

    Alla ryssar hänger på stolparna
    Män och kvinnor, gubbar och barn
    Stolta svenskar skär ben av kropparna
    Och maler dem i en kvarn
    Som kristallen glittrar ett stort hakkors
    Under himlens stjärnebrand
    Führer ler åt dig, Führer ler åt mig,
    Leve Hitlers rasseland!

  3. Srebrenica – The guide for the perplexed
    Mar 9, 2013

    By Ari Rusila

    Over a decade and a half after the event Srebrenica continues to be engulfed in heavy fog. Messages about Srebrenica can be divided in two categories. The first a myth about three days on July 1995, a simplistic story line for the broad masses, not overly concerned with facts and arguments, and certainly not encouraging critical analysis. It is based on the repetition of emotional platitudes such as “genocide” and “eight thousand executed men and boys”. The second category projects a propaganda line geared to a more select and influential public. It is based on the pseudo-history of the Yugoslav conflict promoted by the Hague Tribunal and the political apparatus which sustains it. To point out the many questionable aspects of the official narrative about what happened there, The Srebrenica Historical Project has created a presentation Srebrenica The guide for the perplexed a concise exposition of basic facts.

    To give a bit more comprehensive picture about Srebrenica case I would like to highlight – with help of presentation mentioned above – few key questions which are challenging the official (ICTY, Western mainstream media) picture as follows:

    8000 executed men and boys

    How could an allegation of the execution of 8,000 individuals be made and then widely accepted if the only hard evidence in The Hague Tribunal’s possession that points to summary execution involves the remains of 442 persons that were found with blindfolds and ligatures? Indeed, where are the bodies to support the claim of 8,000 execution victims?

    In ICTY procedure in Hague the number of Srebrenica victims has varieted from trial to trial. First the standard estimate of executed victims in Srebrenica was 7,000 to 8,000. In the recent Tolimir trial judgment, however, that figure was put at 4,970. Similarly, in all previous Srebrenica trials dealing with Branjevo farm executions, victim estimates were based on the claims of ”Starwittness Erdemovic, one of the perpetrators who made a plea bargain with the Prosecution. The accepted figure was 1,200 victims, notwithstanding the fact that the number of bodies exhumed at the crime scene was 115.

    Where are the famous satellite photos that US Secretary of State Madeleine Albright advertised as the definitive proof that a crime of huge dimensions did occur around Srebrenica? Why are they under seal for fifty years if they are of such enormous probative value? If they were made available to the public and to neutral experts for critical analysis now, would that not benefit everybody because many persistent doubts about Srebrenica would quickly be resolved?

    Map of military operations during the Srebrenica massacre, July 1995
    The laughable reason given for insisting on the photos’ confidentiality is that showing publicly them might compromise intelligence gathering methods. That rationale is an insult to the intelligence of the public because the methods used in 1995 are long obsolete.

    As the supply of legitimate Srebrenica execution mass graves began to dry up, and bodies needed to back up the 8,000 genocide victims claim were in short supply, the Muslim-controlled Missing Persons Commission focused, for instance, on a locale called Kamenica. They played down the fact that Kamenica was on the path of withdrawal of the Muslim army 28th Division in July of 1995 and that a major clash with Bosnian Serb forces took place there, with numerous Muslim casualties.

    DNA?

    The forensic evidence (DNA) is more unhelpful than helpful to the Prosecution’s claim that there were about 8,000 execution victims in Srebrenica. Ten years later, there was no trace of even the 4,805 bodies that in its trial judgment the Krstic court gullibly stated had been “detected” in unexhumed Srebrenica mass graves.Body counting and forensic analysis in the classical sense had reached an embarrassing dead end. The standard forensic approach which is based on autopsies may not have generated the hoped for 8,000 victims, but in a situation of this nature it generates at least some legally useful evidence. The standard approach did yield 947 potential execution victims (442 with blindfolds and ligatures, plus 505 with bullet injuries).

    How can it be asserted that the human remains exhumed so far prove summary executions on a large scale when in their autopsy reports ICTY Prosecution forensic experts conceded that out of 3,568 exhumed “cases” 1,583 or 44.4 %, consisted only of body parts, and that in 1,462 or 92.4 % of them no conclusion could be drawn regarding the cause of death?

    DNA is currently presented as undeniable proof of “genocide”. However, DNA findings cannot establish key elements of a murder case, the cause and time of death, which is important given the possibility of many combat deaths as well as natural deaths and burials in the Srebrenica area prior to July 1995.

    Combat casualties instead of genocide

    “If you want to use a word “genocide” (for Srebrenica) – then OK, but we need a new word to replace the old “genocide” word…” (Noam Chomsky)

    The status of the 12,000 to 15,000 strong military/civilian, mostly male column which left Srebrenica enclave on foot late on July 11, 1995, headed for Muslim-controlled territory in Tuzla, is a key factor in the controversy over what happened. ICTY Prosecution military expert Richard Butler conceded the mixed character of the column, which under international law makes it a legitimate military target.Testifying in the Popovic case, Butler reiterated that position. The legal character of the column and the extent of its casualties are of the utmost importance because in an effort to reach the magic figure of 8,000, combat losses inflicted on the column are conflated with execution victims.These casualties were estimated by prosecution military expert Richard Butler, when testifying in the Popovic trial, to have been 1,000 to 2,000 for the period of July 12 to 18, 1995, and raised to between 2,000 and 4,000 at a subsequent trial. Given the severe dearth of incontestable execution victims, the presence of thousands of these legitimate Srebrenica casualties is at worst an embarrassment, but at best an opportunity. The opportunity is to blend them in with execution victims, thus eliminating the problem and at the same time helpfully raising the victims’ total, even if it still remains short of the target figure of 8,000.

    In his latest book titled “Srebrenica — The History of Salon Racism” (Srebrenica — die Geschichte eines salonfahigen Rassismus) published 2010 in Berlin, Alexander Dorin focuses on manipulations with the number of Muslims who lost their lives in Srebrenica. “It is perfectly clear that Muslim organizations listed as Srebrenica victims all the Muslim fighters who were killed in the fights after the fall of Srebrenica,” the Swiss researcher said. Dorin explained that director of the Belgrade Center for Investigation of War Crimes Milivoje Ivanišević analyzed the lists of alleged Srebrenica victims. Ivanišević discovered that, a year after the fall of Srebrenica, some 3,000 Muslim men who were supposedly killed in 1995, were voting in the Bosnian Muslim elections. It asserted that no more than 2,000 Bosnian Muslims had died at Srebrenica – all armed soldiers, not civilians – and that 1,600 of them had died in combat or while trying to escape the enclave. In addition, at least 1,000 of the alleged 1995 “Srebrenica massacre victims” have been dead long before or after Bosnian Serb Army took the town over.

    Planning the narrative – two years before

    The “Srebrenica massacre” is the greatest triumph of propaganda to emerge from the Balkan wars.(Edward Herman)

    There is also many arguments about political PR game behind exaggerated death numbers, misrepresentation of early reports and manipulated pictures. Indeed President Izetbegovic according mentioned UNSG Report told in 1993 that he had learned that a NATO intervention in Bosnia and Herzegovina was possible, but could only occur if the Serbs were to break into Srebrenica, killing at least 5,000 of its people.” So from here are the numbers originating – two years before events in Srebrenica. (Source: UN report Memorandum on war crimes and crimes and genocide in eastern Bosnia )

    The authenticity and the implications of this shocking scheme are extensively explored by Ola Flyum in his documentary film Srebrenica: A town betrayed.

    Bosnian Muslim violence against Bosnian Serbs from UN protected safe zone

    If Srebrenica was indeed a UN protected demilitarized safe zone, how was it possible for it to be used as a training ground and launching pad by Muslim army forces inside it against Serbian civilian villages and military positions outside?

    There was also a long history of atrocious Bosnian Muslim violence and treachery perpetrated against Bosnian Serbs leading up to the events of 1995.The most cruel crimes were committed by the 3rd Corps 7th Muslim Mountain Brigade, to which were subordinated foreign Muslim fighters, also known as mujahedeen, who came from Islamic countries through Osama bin Laden’s terrorist network. “Demilitarized safe area of Srebrenica” served as the safe haven to this brigade lead by Bosnian Muslim leader of Srebrenica forces Naser Oric. From there the brigade went to implement series of atrocious attacks on the near-by Serbian areas.

    An important issue pertaining to Srebrenica that is almost never talked about are the Serbian victims. The trick of excluding them is performed by simply narrowing down the relevant Srebrenica chronology to three days in July of 1995, while completely ignoring events during the preceding three years. In the three-year period before the massacre of Muslims in 1995, According to the Dutch Institute for War Documentation (NIOD), these attacks “…followed a certain pattern. Initially, Serbs were driven out of ethnically mixed towns. Then Serbian hamlets surrounded by Muslim towns were attacked and finally the remaining Serbian settlements were overrun. The residents were murdered, their homes were plundered and burnt down or blown up.” As a consequence, “it is estimated that between 1,000 and 1,200 Serbs died in these attacks, while about 3,000 of them were wounded. Ultimately, of the 9,390 Serbian inhabitants of the Srebrenica district, only 860 remained…”

    Why are these substantial figures (Serb victims)rarely reported or given even fleeting attention in discussions about Srebrenica, although they are undoubtedly an integral part of the overall picture and their relevance to the events of July of 1995 is indisputable?

    First of all, because this is precisely what generated the “accumulated hatred” that was clearly sensed by the UNPROFOR commander in Bosnia, General Philippe Morillon, which he referred to as the consequence of these “terrible massacres.”Second, perhaps because these pogroms created a motive for taking revenge on the perceived malefactors when that became possible in July of 1995. The latter point clearly upsets the genocide applecart because it posits a compelling alternative explanation of the motive.

    R2P based on Srebrenica

    One aspect which keeps the official narrative about Srebrenica alive is that the case is the fundamental element of R2P (Responsibility to Protect) concept. The Srebrenica narrative serves as the cornerstone of this important new doctrine in international relations and since Bosnia been used with many conflicts around the globe as tool of western interventions.

    First, as former US ambassador to Croatia Peter Galbraith recently revealed, in terms of the Bosnian conflict “endgame” Croatia’s Operation Storm in 1995 against Serb-held areas in the Krajina would not have been feasible had not “Srebrenica” prepared the ground for it, morally and psychologically. The Srebrenica narrative and the outrage it produced served as a convenient veil to shield atrocities committed during the Croatian offensive in August of 1995 from substantial public examination or criticism.

    As Bill Clinton, the U.S. President who had stood by in Bosnia, wavered again, Mr Blair warned that Kosovo was a test of whether civilised nations acted before it was too late. “This is not a battle for territory; this is a battle for humanity. It is a just cause, it is a rightful cause,” he argued.

    A couple of more examples: “We prevented a new Srebrenica in Libya” (Hilary Clinton) Recently U.N. Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon called on world powers to urgently unite to end the bloodshed in Syria, recalling the inertia of the United Nations in 1995 as genocide occurred in the Bosnian town of Srebrenica.

    My view

    Was Srebrenica – a hoax or massacre? I would say both; a hoax due the well planned and implemented PR campaign, a massacre when the Serbs went to trap and used brutal force also against civilians.(Ari Rusila)
    From my point of view the myth of 8,000 executed men and boys is busted. It was planed well before to get U.S.involvement with war against Serbs. An essential part of narrative was the death toll of 8,000 and that the victims were civilians. However the figures after decade and half intensive bodycount don’t match. Besides numbers it has came clear that most of the military-age men from Srebrenica assembled in the village of Susnjari and from there under-took a 60 kilometer trek through minefields and Serbian ambushes to Tuzla as they were affraid Serb revenge due their atrocities against Serbs during preceding two years. As for the women, children, and elderly, they were left behind and deposited at the UN compound in Potocari. Quite possibly that was done as a convenient bait to the Serbs to perpetrate the anticipated massacre, but whatever the ultimate motive behind it may have been, on the whole nothing sinister occurred. The 20,000 or so enclave residents dumped in Potocari were put by the Serbs on buses and evacuated safely to Muslim territory.

    One can claim that Srebrenica was not a genocide and definition ethnic cleansing is weak too, instead it was a partly war crime provoked by crimes on the other side. Partly as mostly the deads in Srebrenica on July 1995 happened when 28. Muslim Division tried to escape from town to Muslim held territory knowing the amount of hatred among local Serbs and lost their life during this operation. Saying this I’d like to point out that sure there was civilian casualties, innocent victims as well executions which can be seen as war crimes and crimes against humanity etc.

    Despite unprecedented efforts over the past ten years to recover bodies from the area around Srebrenica, less than 3,000 have been exhumed, and these include soldiers and others – Serb as well as Muslim – who died in the vicious combats that took place during three years of war. Only a fraction have been identified. Probably a massacre happened but maybe not like that picture which main stream media has offered.

    Ari Rusila is a development project management expert and freelancer from Finland with a special interest in the Balkan region. His blog is at http://arirusila.wordpress.com

    Tags: Ari Rusila

    This news story was posted on Saturday, March 9th, 2013 at 9:00 am and is filed under Bosnia, Bosnian Muslims, Crime. You can follow any responses to this news story through the RSS 2.0 feed. Both comments and pings are currently closed.

  4. That you are really a good web marketer. The site loading quickness is actually remarkable. Them form of seems that you’ll be carrying out virtually any distinctive secret. Furthermore, The subject matter will be must-see. you must have done a fantastic job during this matter!

  5. I leave a response whenever I like a post on a site or if I have something to add to the discussion. It is caused by the sincerness displayed in the post I looked at. And on this post Ture Nermans bok Folkhatet och massakern i Srebrenica 1995. | Sverige är inte världens navel!. I was actually moved enough to post a comment 😉 I actually do have a couple of questions for you if you tend not to mind. Is it just me or do a few of these responses come across like left by brain dead folks? 😛 And, if you are posting at other online sites, I’d like to keep up with you. Could you list all of your community sites like your Facebook page, twitter feed, or linkedin profile?

  6. Hello There. I discovered your weblog the usage of msn. This is a very smartly written article. I’ll make sure to bookmark it and return to read more of your helpful info. Thanks for the post. I’ll definitely return.

  7. ωhoah thiѕ weblog is great i love reading your
    posts. Stay up the great work! You know, many persons are searching rounԁ for this info,
    уouu can aiԁd them greatly.

  8. By performing all of your due diligence when coming up with
    choices for your aquaponics system, you may avoid making costly mistakes.
    Aquaponics gives a supreme experience of staying all-around nature
    inside the clustered and chaotic cities. The system is
    only going to require the addition of hardly any water each week.

  9. I know this website provides quality dependent posts and other material,
    is there any other web site which presents these
    kinds of data in quality?

  10. It can be great time and energy to produce a number of blueprints in the future and it is time to feel very special. I’ve study that create if I might My spouse and i wish to recommend people a number of fascinating things or even strategies. Perhaps you can write future content with this article. I would like to learn more reasons for the item!

  11. I loved as much as you will receive carried out right here.
    The sketch is tasteful, your authored material stylish.
    nonetheless, you command get got an edginess over that you wish be delivering the
    following. unwell unquestionably come more formerly again as exactly the same nearly a lot often inside
    case you shield this increase.

  12. Admiring the dedication you put into your site and detailed information you provide.
    It’s great to come across a blog every once in a while that isn’t the same outdated rehashed material.

    Wonderful read! I’ve bookmarked your site and I’m including
    your RSS feeds to my Google account.

  13. In summary, if you need to lose weight, go anywhere and complete
    boot camp class. Adiphene is a fats burner slimming
    capsules that been produced from 12 substances. The powerful elements of Adiphene are clinically tested and
    verified as extremely effective towards
    excess fat within the physique.

  14. So why is being overweight such a direct link to
    diabetes. This means thay everybody who makes use of Adiphene should shed pounds.
    Glucomannan is among the most active hunger suppressants in Adiphene,
    and it works to suppress yearnings and help you handle your parts.

  15. So verrissen das Daddeln auch sein mag, so ist experimentell erwiesen worden, dass das Zocken, grundlegende geistige Unversehrtheit des Spielenden vorausgesetzt,
    förderlich für das Reaktionsvermögen des Gamers sein kann.
    Beim Zocken lernt der Gamer schneller als üblich zu Entscheiden und zwischen wichtig und unwichtig zu unterscheiden. Viele Games
    vermitteln zusätzlich noch Grundkenntnisse über Wirtschaftlichkeit und fördern die Logik.
    Selbst die verpönten MMOs können doch manchmal den falsch vermittelten Effekt der sozialen Verwahrlosung} aufhalten. Man wird zwar schon einigen wenigen Freaks begegnen, doch findet der Spieler öfters exakt in seinem Lieblingsspiel Gleichgesinnte.

    Kurz gefasst: das Spielen ist hammer! Egal was man spielt und auch ob PC,Konsole,Handy,etc.
    .

  16. I was extremely pleased to find this website. I need to to thank you
    for your time due to this wonderful read!! I definitely savored every part of it and i also have you saved
    as a favorite to see new stuff on your blog.

  17. Good post. I learn something new and challenging on sites I stumbleupon every day.
    It will always be helpful to read articles from other writers and use a
    little something from their sites.

  18. We’ve understand a number of ideal stuff the following Web Site. Undoubtedly amount social bookmarking regarding revisiting. I ponder how much effort you placed to generate these kinds of wonderful informative web-site.

Kommentera

Fyll i dina uppgifter nedan eller klicka på en ikon för att logga in:

WordPress.com Logo

Du kommenterar med ditt WordPress.com-konto. Logga ut / Ändra )

Twitter-bild

Du kommenterar med ditt Twitter-konto. Logga ut / Ändra )

Facebook-foto

Du kommenterar med ditt Facebook-konto. Logga ut / Ändra )

Google+ photo

Du kommenterar med ditt Google+-konto. Logga ut / Ändra )

Ansluter till %s